Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Portuguese term or phrase:
sendo controvertido o invocado por cada uma das partes em tais processos;
English translation:
whereas the allegations of each party of the relevant proceedings are conflicting
Added to glossary by
Mario Freitas
Jul 20, 2015 15:35
8 yrs ago
2 viewers *
Portuguese term
sendo controvertido o invocado por cada uma das partes em tais processos;
Portuguese to English
Tech/Engineering
Law (general)
Legal stuff
Considerando estão pendents processos judiciais, sendo controvertido o invocado por cada uma das partes em tais processos;
This makes no sense at all to me!
Any suggestions?
I can't chop it up any more or it would not be in context.
This makes no sense at all to me!
Any suggestions?
I can't chop it up any more or it would not be in context.
Proposed translations
(English)
Change log
Aug 11, 2015 15:59: Mario Freitas Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
1 hr
Portuguese term (edited):
sendo controvertido o invocado por cada uma das partes em tais processos
Selected
whereas the allegations of each party of the relevant proceedings are conflicting
Sugestão
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "I can understand this"
9 mins
is controversial what was invoked by each Party in such claims
O significado: o que cada uma das partes alega nos processos é controverso.
2 hrs
, being contested that invoked by each of the parties in said proceedings
Whereas judicial proceedings are pending, being contested that invoked by each of the parties in said proceedings:
2 hrs
(BrE) with denial of what has been pleaded by each of the parties in such trials
alternatively and longer.winded: with issue being joined upon the averments made by....
BrE but speculatively also intelligible in the US & Canada,
BrE but speculatively also intelligible in the US & Canada,
Discussion
Although I would like to keep the mumbo-jumbo factor intact, I just can't help myself.... I'm going for something that, at least, sounds like it makes sense to me, so I am going to use Mario's suggestion.
By the way, in this case, I don't think there has been denial, yet. Controversy is one step before denial.
(2) The revocation by these Regulations of a saving on the previous revocation of a provision does not affect the operation of the saving in so far as it is not specifically reproduced in these Regulations but remains capable of having effect.'
(From Schedule 1 to other Income Tax (Construction Industry Scheme) Regulations)