GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
15:50 May 20, 2007 |
Portuguese to English translations [PRO] Social Sciences - Anthropology / Indigenous peoples | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Peter Shortall United Kingdom | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | etnic self-assertion |
| ||
3 | (right to) assert their own ethnic identity |
|
etnic self-assertion Explanation: etnic self-assertion Matt, I found 1.200,000 hits for ethnic self-assertion and due to your context it even makes sense. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 4 hrs (2007-05-20 20:33:01 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- sorry ethnic Reference: http://www.angelfire.com/id/multicultural/ethno.html |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
(right to) assert their own ethnic identity Explanation: To me, "ethnic self-assertion" is clear enough but I'll try to explain what I think is meant here: presumably this is about where you draw the lines between dialects and languages. Take Arabic, for example: a speaker of Arabic from, say, Iraq would have a certain amount of difficulty understanding the Arabic spoken by someone from Algeria, yet both would tell you that they speak "Arabic". The two "dialects" probably have a lower degree of mutual intelligibility than, say, Swedish and Norwegian, which are officially two different languages (and for an extreme case, try Romanian and "Moldovan"). It's basically a question of politics. Chinese is another example where regional dialects aren't necessarily mutually intelligible; a friend of mine from Hunan province once told me that he would have difficulty understanding the dialects spoken in Shanghai or Fujian, for example, even though officially they're all "Chinese". So here we have the Nambikwara family of languages, and presumably the question has arisen of how you classify them: are they dialects of a single language, for example, or should we say that they are distinct languages? And this is where people's ethnic identity plays a part. If some groups see themselves as being ethnically different from others, presumably they will want their dialect/language to be recognised as a separate language. We're told that there are differences between the dialects/languages, and this is why the question of classification has arisen. Hope that makes sense. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 5 hrs (2007-05-20 20:55:56 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- "...assert their own ethnic *identities*", in fact, since there is more than one group (povos = peopleS) -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 5 hrs (2007-05-20 21:29:59 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- and "alterou-se" is in the past, not the present - you'll have to reorder that bit (i.e. "the classification structure... was changed"). |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.