Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Mar 13, 2002 02:34
22 yrs ago
1 viewer *
French term
avionable
French to English
Tech/Engineering
Aerospace / Aviation / Space
aviation
can't think of this English word that means a particular aircraft part can still be used in an airplane.
Proposed translations
(English)
5 | airworthy | Trudy Peters |
5 | Aircraft adaptable | wflyer (X) |
4 | approved for service | Trudy Peters |
4 | airworthy | cheungmo |
1 | avionics?? | sheila adrian (X) |
Proposed translations
14 mins
Selected
airworthy
I think that's it
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "this is exactly the word I was looking for!"
6 mins
approved for service
would that work??
That doesn't necessarily imply that it's a used part, though.
Still thinking...
That doesn't necessarily imply that it's a used part, though.
Still thinking...
10 mins
Aircraft adaptable
Hello Marcus,
The term for this is actually two words and in aviation/aeronautics it can apply to a part or a system on an aircraft.
Hope this helps
Catherine
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2002-03-13 02:52:52 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Just for you to know, I specialize in aviation and I am a pilot...
The term for this is actually two words and in aviation/aeronautics it can apply to a part or a system on an aircraft.
Hope this helps
Catherine
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2002-03-13 02:52:52 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Just for you to know, I specialize in aviation and I am a pilot...
19 mins
airworthy
The document at the first link, a report from the European Organisation for Air Safety, translated "ruggedised" to "avionable" in the French resume.
All the other instances I've found refer to equipment primarily intended for use in aircraft which implies they're heavy-duty (because of the inherent vibrations of aircraft in flight).
However, for your instance, I'd go with "airworthy" for the simple reason that what's important for your case is not that the part in question is ruggedised but rather that the part be fit for use in an aircraft.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2002-03-13 02:54:16 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Darn. Forgot the link.
http://www.eurocontrol.fr/public/reports/eecnotes/1995/1.pdf
All the other instances I've found refer to equipment primarily intended for use in aircraft which implies they're heavy-duty (because of the inherent vibrations of aircraft in flight).
However, for your instance, I'd go with "airworthy" for the simple reason that what's important for your case is not that the part in question is ruggedised but rather that the part be fit for use in an aircraft.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2002-03-13 02:54:16 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Darn. Forgot the link.
http://www.eurocontrol.fr/public/reports/eecnotes/1995/1.pdf
6 hrs
avionics??
did the word you were looking for have a relation to "avionics" perhaps?
Something went wrong...